Categories
Foreign Articles

Koo A., 2008, European Intellectual Property Review, 30/2008, 2, p. 74

Distribution over Peer-to-Peer network.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Korman B., 1995, The journal of the copyright society of the U.S.A., p. 158

U.S. position on collective administration of copyright and anti-trust law.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kozinski A. – Newman C., 1999, The journal of the copyright society of the U.S.A., p. 513

What’s so fair about fair use? The 1999 Donald C. Brace memorial lecture.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kreile R., 1992, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, vol. 22, 1-6/1992, p. 449

Collection and distribution of the statutory remuneration for private copying with respect to recorders and blank cassettes in Germany.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kristjan – Larusson H., 2009, EIPR, no. 3, p. 124

Uncertainty in the scope of copyright: The case of illegal file sharing in the United Kingdom.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kruger C., 2006, The journal of the copyright society of the U.S.A., p. 447

Passing the global test: DMCA & 1201 as an international model for transitioning copyright law into the digital age.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kuner C., 2008, European Intellectual Property Review, 30/2008, 5, p. 199

Data protection and rights protection on the internet: The promusicae judgement of the European Court of Justice.  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kunz P., 2006, DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law and Policy, vol. 17, no. 1 (Fall 2006), p 167

Whose tube? – a contributory copyright infringement analysis of the pending lawsuit, Robert Tur v. Youtube Inc..  

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kur A., 2000, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law. vol. 31. 1-8/2000. p. 308

The “presentation right” – Time to create a new limitation in copyright law? 

Categories
Foreign Articles

Kur A., et al., 2006, IIC – International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, p.551

First evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases – Comment by the Max Planck Institute for intellectual property, competition and tax law, Munich.